I got tired of not having a blog. This isn’t at all ready for prime time, but here it is. If you find yourself reading something you don’t feel you should be reading–please, do us both a favor: stop.
illegitimi carborundum me
Bah!
This blog inexorably trends toward idleness. This lamentable result owes to two factors. First, my gradual capitulation to the numb stuffed-couch comforts of passive entertainment (not a sentence and I’m passive entertainment over it).
My life has become increasingly bimodal, divided into periods of intense activity and profound inactivity. I don’t know why. When I’m not working, I’m increasingly consuming highly passive entertainment. I mean, really passive. Blogging is entirely too much effort after a long day of work.
The second force is more pernicious: self-censorship.
When I started this blog (seven years ago… sheesh!) posting (personal thoughts) on the internet was like swearing in the woods: it didn’t matter, because no one could hear you. That’s no longer the case. Obviously. I prize my position as the first Google result for “Mark Egge”. But it’s also a liability as we all increasingly turn to the internet to learn about strangers (and ourselves).
A blog post, [simili omitted], once required effort to seek out and to find. Now, I click [Submit] and whatever ill-advised introspection I happen to be typing is instantly pushed into the pockets of acquaintances across the globe.
I have not kept up with the times. I’ve continued to treat my blog as a private enclave for sharing thoughts with close friends. There’s a bit of a circle to it, actually. I post thoughts wildly inappropriate for a wide audience. Inevitably–and with worrisome speed–that something gets back to me. Which discourages me from posting. Then I do it again, and the cycle repeats.
Of course, I could simply stop posting inappropriate things. I could start a nice outdoor adventure blog. Review movies, music (or books, but those have largely succumbed to my passive entertainment addiction). A COOKING blog, for crying out loud! God SAVE us!!
This might even sound reasonable to some! But it’s not! I’ve only ever blogged for two reasons: 1) to chronicle my thoughts and experiences (for myself) and 2) to occasionally enrage, bemuse or offend my friends. Just the pretense of writing to a broader audience should be sufficient to drive away any lingering readers!
Blogging is fun when posting the profane, snarky, offensive and obtuse thoughts that most have the good sense to keep to themselves.
So. It’s time for me to modernize. Not by perfecting my self-censorship–but by refining my audience.
Thus, I’m updating eateggs.com to a modern blogging platform (the current version of eateggs.com runs on a platform I coded myself in high school…). All “personal” posts (such as this one) will be accessible via authenticated log-in only. It’ll be a pain in the ass for all involved.
But holds a certain promise: once we’re back in the woods, I’ll start swearing again.
Rivers
Having seen the San Rafael Swell from the top (i.e. from the Wedge Overlook), I decided it was time to see it from the bottom. I rented an inflatable kayak from the Carbon County Rec Center, waited for some rain to blow over, then impulsively decided to go down a Class II+ section of the nearby Price River. It proved a challenging introduction to the sport. Water’s powerful. Like, crazy powerful. Buoyancy is no match.
In any case, I survived (and, thanks to Jack’s Plastic Welding, my stuff even stayed dry!), somewhat wiser.
Kayaked the San Rafael River a few days later, from Fuller’s Bottom to the San Rafael Campground. The run was every bit as beautiful and impressive from the bottom as one would expect from the top. Went down a nearby creek the next day. Here are some pictures:
![]() |
| 2010.06.18 Rivers! |
Made it to Telluride early Saturday morning, in plenty of time to see some incredible music (including Jerry Douglas, Béla Fleck, Sam Bush, and Yonder Mountain String Band). Fittingly, a half-moon rose in the south-eastern sky while Yonder performed.
But Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros stole the show–giving one of the best live performances I’ve ever been privileged to see. Such tremendous and positive energy, channeled through a full stage of nine musicians. The band’s carnivalesque sound is borne out in their costumes–appearing as a band of gypsies, transported to Telluride’s mountain stage straight from their depression-era migration to California’s fruit fields in search of work. I can’t help but wonder if the band members appear on stage as themselves, of they’re in elaborate and brilliant costume. Whether sincere to affected, the result is brilliant.
I often find it off-putting when a band’s lead singer doesn’t play an instrument. Not so for Alex Ebert, whose eccentrism and energy would only be encumbered by an instrument and less mobile than a tambourine (at any given time, up to four tambourines are often being played on stage). I suspect he’s mad (or, again, a brilliant performer), but the passion that courses through the songs is powerful, almost palpable when performed for a live audience.
I don’t know if I’ve gained any new appreciation for their debut album, Up From Below–but I have tremendous appreciation for the band. If you get a chance to see Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros live, do. Period.
—
It’s funny–I’m certain I’ve seen more “celebrate diversity” bumper stickers in Telluride than anyone representing the diversity to be celebrated. What an incredibly white place. You’d think I would be de-sensitized to angle-saxon overload, living in Bozeman the last six years.
I’m off to Mesa Verde and Natural Bridges, en route to Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Whoo!
ugly duckling
I’m kayaking down the Price river, running the section between the Scofield Reservoir and the UT 6. I’m cold–a logjam a few miles upriver dumped me. The sun’s out, but the day is cool–especially when wet. The sun reflects off the rippling water, the tall marsh grasses on either side, the small, whitish sandstone outcrop ahead at the bend.
Approaching the bend, I flush a duck and ducklings (Northern Pintail, I believe). Three, four, five–everything’s moving quickly. I can’t count them all. I’ve never seen so many.
They take off down-river, the ducklings stringing out behind their mom. The ducklings form a chain–ten feet long–anchored to their mother. They’re swimming as fast as they’re able–yet with sufficient presence of mind to form a line. Schoolchildren could learn from ducks.
They’re beautiful, swimming quickly downstream. I feel a pang of regret that my presence, in my big, yellow, rented inflatable kayak, is causing such wonderful creatures such distress. If only they knew that I mean no harm.
Rounding the bend, with the ducks all in a row, I’m able to count nine ducklings. But wait–wasn’t there one more?
Then I seem him, the tenth duckling. He’s swimming twenty feet behind the chain of siblings. He’s smaller, and is swimming with a sort of spastic, frenzied gait. His siblings are smooth and composed. I wonder if it’s simply on account of his size (working harder to try to keep up), or if he has some deformity.
He can’t keep up. The other ducks easily outpace me in my little rubber kayak. He can’t escape. He stays barely ahead of my bow. )
The duckling’s mom and siblings continue quickly, smoothly, easily down the river. The distance between them grows. It becomes apparent that he’s being left behind.
The bunch soon disappears around another bend ahead. Their straggler sibling stays just ahead of my bow, growing visible exhausted. I cross to the far bank to give him (her?) some space. He stops, then starts, then finally stops. I float past. His family has long since passed out of sight.
And I’m heartbroken. I’ve just witnessed duckling–smaller and slower than his (her?) siblings–abandoned. They never hesitated. The hen never slowed or turned her head. She’ll count her ducklings when the danger’s passed.
Three or four times more I encounter the bunch. Rounding a corner, I see them. They startle, and resume their quick course downriver.
I doubt that ducks share our notion of the atomic family. I’m sure, on the river, the hen that slows to wait for the slowest duckling looses the whole brood. But I couldn’t help but to feel some measure of guilt for how I had just broken a family–had thrust the youngest and smallest into premature independence.
Heisman v. Goldwater: Athletic Success and Academic Recruitment
Abstract:
Assuming intercollegiate athletic success leads to increased university applications, is this effect similar between research universities and non-research universities? To find out, 2001 through 2009 applicant statistics for 115 universities with NCAA Division 1-A football teams are analyzed. Athletic success at non-research institutions is found to increase subsequent applications by nearly 10%. Athletic success at research institutions, by contrast, produces a negative, non-significant effect.
Download the full paper here: Mark_Egge-2010-Heisman_v_Goldwater.pdf.
